And another thing
Nov. 3rd, 2004 04:14 pmWhy is it that, in science fiction, when someone regretfully considers doing away with an entire gender - for the good of the species and/or the world, of course - it’s always the males? Where are the stories that propose getting rid of women (and all the problems they cause) and carrying on the race of Man through wholly artificial means? And why do I suspect that such a story would be immediately branded as hate speech?
(I ran across yet another example of the former yesterday, and as a non-knuckle-dragging-wife-beating member of the male gender, it bothers me a little to think that there’s a segment of the population which considers me the cause of most of history’s ills and entirely dispensable.)
(I ran across yet another example of the former yesterday, and as a non-knuckle-dragging-wife-beating member of the male gender, it bothers me a little to think that there’s a segment of the population which considers me the cause of most of history’s ills and entirely dispensable.)
(no subject)
Date: 2004-11-04 12:31 am (UTC)Because...
Date: 2004-11-04 12:43 am (UTC)2) Biologically, it's easy to reproduce a purely female population; much harder to do purely male.
3) Males do have more tendencies for violence, etc., making it easy to fingerpoint.
4) Male writers mostly like women, and can't imagine wanting to do away with them (enslave them, mind-control them, yes, but just wipe them out and be left with ... OTHER MEN? Ewww.). Female writers tend to be less fixated on sex, and therefore have less concern about eliminating the other sex.
I find that theme just as annoying as you do, by the way.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-11-04 01:12 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-11-04 08:14 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-12-11 09:43 pm (UTC)And yes, it annoys the hell out of me.