A thought on King's "Dreamcatcher"
Mar. 28th, 2008 02:48 pmQ. Why "____weasels"?
A. Because if he had them take the shorter route from the stomach, out through the front/belly, everyone would immediately realize he's just ripping off Alien within his usual mis en scene of fictionalized Maine. It's the only "new" element in an otherwise mostly recycled story, by virtue of being stolen from someone else rather than from his own previous works (particularly It).
A. Because if he had them take the shorter route from the stomach, out through the front/belly, everyone would immediately realize he's just ripping off Alien within his usual mis en scene of fictionalized Maine. It's the only "new" element in an otherwise mostly recycled story, by virtue of being stolen from someone else rather than from his own previous works (particularly It).
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-28 10:03 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-28 10:16 pm (UTC)Nor did I intend to hold Alien up as some exemplar (q.v. "Voyage of the Space Beagle"); but if anything, your comment only helps to further damn King's work as 100% post-writer product, if he can't even steal a new idea.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-28 10:18 pm (UTC)"Scary lamp! Scary lamp!"
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-28 10:20 pm (UTC)Mind you, there are a lot of writers out there who ought to turn their efforts to plagiarism. The DC Comics universe, for instance, would be a lot less tiresome now if Geoff Johns had just scraped the serial numbers off The Iliad and called it a day. :)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-28 11:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-28 11:22 pm (UTC)