Some thoughts on the cult of obtuseness
Jun. 2nd, 2008 02:00 amHaving the patience, perversity, and/or borderline autism to master an incomplete or poorly-designed user interface does not in any significant way make one more cool, intelligent, or "elite" than a hypothetical average person. Elevating such masochism to a virtue reflects poorly on those who do so, suggesting that they are desperate for something they can claim to make them feel superior or even merely adequate in their accomplishments.
It may be that the programmer has more important things to do at this moment than produce a polished, intuitive and fully documented interface, or has no talent for making one himself; regardless of the reason, the fact remains that a game or other software application is not truly complete until a user is able to spend more time doing useful work than in wrestling with the interface in order to translate his or her will into input that the program understands.
Equal to the challenge and accomplishment of creating a fantastically complex system is creating a means for the user to control that system, to whatever level of detail they desire, with ease and confidence. To elevate one over the other reveals a misunderstanding of what is involved in both.
When I read posts by people smugly asserting that not everyone deserves to play a game or use an OS, I find myself thinking of those who just as righteously assert that many or even most are not worthy to enter Paradise. I also reflect on how many of these very "intelligent" people are probably unable to dress themselves fashionably or present themselves well in ordinary social situations. Is it unfair of me to suggest that in some cases, incompetence in one arena may lead to undue focus on others as a measure of personal worth?
It may be that the programmer has more important things to do at this moment than produce a polished, intuitive and fully documented interface, or has no talent for making one himself; regardless of the reason, the fact remains that a game or other software application is not truly complete until a user is able to spend more time doing useful work than in wrestling with the interface in order to translate his or her will into input that the program understands.
Equal to the challenge and accomplishment of creating a fantastically complex system is creating a means for the user to control that system, to whatever level of detail they desire, with ease and confidence. To elevate one over the other reveals a misunderstanding of what is involved in both.
When I read posts by people smugly asserting that not everyone deserves to play a game or use an OS, I find myself thinking of those who just as righteously assert that many or even most are not worthy to enter Paradise. I also reflect on how many of these very "intelligent" people are probably unable to dress themselves fashionably or present themselves well in ordinary social situations. Is it unfair of me to suggest that in some cases, incompetence in one arena may lead to undue focus on others as a measure of personal worth?
(no subject)
Date: 2008-06-02 12:14 pm (UTC)I view that attitude with the same contempt now as I did then.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-06-02 07:12 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-06-03 05:32 am (UTC)Interfaces
Date: 2008-06-03 05:22 pm (UTC)