Keeping their story straight dept.
Jul. 29th, 2009 11:40 amIf the changes seen in this spring's Star Trek movie were all the result of a temporal incursion, then the Kelvin - which is present at and first victim of that incursion - should have looked exactly like Pike's Enterprise from "The Cage", beige uniforms and all. It probably would not be a Constitution class starship, but it should look very similar (c.f. the Hermes class) in design, exterior markings, etc.
Even with time travel, effect cannot precede cause. If Nero's arrival and actions in the "past" are what changes the "Prime" timeline to the new one, then it should be identical in all respects up to that moment. The alternative, of course, is that it's a transparent excuse that fails to follow its own rules.
Even with time travel, effect cannot precede cause. If Nero's arrival and actions in the "past" are what changes the "Prime" timeline to the new one, then it should be identical in all respects up to that moment. The alternative, of course, is that it's a transparent excuse that fails to follow its own rules.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-29 07:05 pm (UTC)The idea was a complete reboot with none of the prior series NECESSARILY true, so that they could use the basic characters and setup WITHOUT a bunch of life-deprived geeks whining "... but in Stardate 2120.5 in episode 27, it was clearly shown that..."
(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-29 07:10 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-29 07:13 pm (UTC)As a loyal fan, in other words, they did what I felt they had to do.
Note that there's other clear indications it's a reboot BEFORE the timechange; in that universe, the Federation KNOWS WHAT THE ROMULANS LOOK LIKE. In the original timeline, it was only in "Balance of Terror" that we learn they look like Vulcans."
(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-29 07:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-29 07:29 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-29 07:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-29 07:37 pm (UTC)Think of it as "re-casting" the Kelvin. They got a younger, flashier, and more attractive ship to step in and play the part.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-29 07:52 pm (UTC)mutter, grumble.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-29 08:48 pm (UTC)You want to gripe? How about griping that the Enterprise doesn't look like the original?
But at least with the reboot I can hope that Voyager will never happen, and that whatever follows the Kirk era won't be some watered-down milquetoast future even less consistent than the original.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-29 08:52 pm (UTC)Have, thanks. See previous entries.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-30 12:11 pm (UTC)The original designs were a lot simpler, a lot less 'real' looking. And using them verbatim would've looked pretty cheesy in a modern film.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-30 02:46 pm (UTC)I'm not asking for real Christmas lights in the nacelles. But a battleship grey hull and hull markings in the USAF/Amarillo typeface would have gone a long way.
(changing tracks a little) Heck, since the new E is modeled so clearly on the first movie(s), I'd even accept a version of THAT set design (which, IMO, the shiny iBridge is not, even before JJ starts shining a flashlight in my eyes).
(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-29 09:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-29 11:43 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-31 12:20 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-31 03:34 pm (UTC)